top of page
Search

Why I wish to pursue Science Communication in Post-Secondary Education Full Time

As I near the end of my PhD in molecular biology, I begin reflecting on my past 10 years in post-secondary science education. Like many new doctoral graduates out there, the hope of finding a “real” job consumes your everyday thoughts, and quickly you begin evaluating what your next steps should be professionally. For me, I have always had two constants in my life, science and education. This lead me to completing a dual degree (Concurrent Education) in university which resulted in obtaining both a Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Education. My original plan was always to become a high school science teacher (just like my dad), but as I moved further along on this journey, I was stopped dead in my tracks by research.


At 20 years old, and in my final year of university, I fell in love with the research taking place in a molecular biology lab. I decided that scientific research could be my calling, and I immediately switched paths and enrolled in a Master of Science program with hopes to transfer directly into a PhD. As time went on in grad school I quickly realized that the glamour of scientific research was wearing off and wondered why I didn’t know more about what really went on as a grad student. This lead me to starting my personal blog on Instagram to showcase what the journey of a PhD student working in science looked like.

As I began sharing my experiences as a PhD student on social media, I quickly learned that what I was doing was called Science communication! As an undergrad and grad student I always loved volunteering for various STEM outreach events and sharing science information, but I never knew it had a formal name. From here, I began learning more about how to effectively communicate science in a variety of different setting and to diverse groups of people. You would think as someone who has 10+ years of science education, that communicating that science would be easy. When in reality it is far from easy. You see, my undergraduate courses taught me the hard science – and for many biology students – how to efficiently memorize the details of information. What was lacking (that I didn’t notice at the time) was formal training on how to communicate the science I have learned, and specifically how to break it down for high level explanations. This was the “gap” in my degree.


I began thinking, why was I not taught how to write and communicate science? Surly, communicating science is just as import – if not more important – as learning it. As biology students, we are required to take ethics courses to understand the ethical implications of scientific practice. So, it only makes sense that a communications course is also required. If I never completed a Bachelor of Education – which is uncommon for many science students – I would have never learned these best practices for teaching and communicating science.


As I near the end of my PhD I finally feel like I have found my calling. It was there from the beginning, I just didn’t know how to execute it. My goal is to advocate for science communication for undergraduate science students and implement new courses to supplement this need.

107 views0 comments
bottom of page